<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kill the radio &#187; bsd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.killtheradio.net/tag/bsd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.killtheradio.net</link>
	<description>or die trying</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:21:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Really good article on OS scalability</title>
		<link>http://blog.killtheradio.net/technology/really-good-article-on-os-scalability/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.killtheradio.net/technology/really-good-article-on-os-scalability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lyon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scalability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.killtheradio.net/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Compared are Linux 2.4, 2.6, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD. Really well-performed benchmarks, with graphs. http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability Linux 2.6 was hands down the winner, which makes me feel good about Slackware (2.6 linux but actually stable) as a server. I&#8217;m sure Windows would have won if only it was benchmarked. One thing to keep in mind &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compared are Linux 2.4, 2.6, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD. Really well-performed benchmarks, with graphs.</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/" target="_blank">http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability</a></p>
<p>Linux 2.6 was hands down the winner, which makes me feel good about Slackware (2.6 linux but actually stable) as a server. I&#8217;m sure Windows would have won if only it was benchmarked. One thing to keep in mind &#8211; from what I gathered, the machine tested was a single-processor, single-core machine&#8230;this means that SMP scalability was not tested, a HUGE consideration for more modern servers (what server now <em>doesn&#8217;t</em> have multiple cores?) and may skew the modern-day results, especially between the two leads, FreeBSD and Linux 2.6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.killtheradio.net/technology/really-good-article-on-os-scalability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

