It seems that since widespread adoption of the internet, although more and more people have become seemingly connected through social networking and other mediums, people are drifting further and further apart. A friend is no longer a friend. A real friend is now what a friend was, and a friend is someone you say “damn we haven’t talked in years, how r u?” to. Communities are popping up everywhere online that replace the communities around us physically.

This in itself I don’t feel is bad. A lot of people who never would have met are meeting and sharing new ideas. Information spreads more rapidly. Cultural consciousness is more global, which in most cases is a very good thing.

I think things start to go wrong when people get addicted to this information overload though. They use it as a fuel for everyday distraction, a replacement for the communities they live in, and a tool to deliver opinions and beliefs to them when they would have otherwise had to think (although this last item is true of most media).

Also, it’s one thing to not be in front of someone when you talk to them. A voice conversation can have emotion and depth, but it can also be quick and effortless. The fact that it’s being replaced by one-off messages that are 100% ignorable and have no real content to them is kind of sickening. I’ve heard arguments that “I text someone when it doesn’t make sense to have a whole conversation,” but I’ll see the same person texting back and forth with someone for 10 minutes straight. Or a text is delivered and the person who sent it squirms in anticipation for the reply, which may never come.

What’s wrong with a phone call? Granted, if you’re in a bar and it’s very loud, texting would be appropriate. If you call someone and they don’t pick up, either they don’t want to talk or, god forbid, they aren’t right next to their phone all times of the day. If you want to talk to someone, just call them. I don’t believe texting is a viable replacement for what was the last string of human contact we had.

That all said, I know it’s a giant ball and it rolls where it rolls and there’s no stopping it. There’s no problem with being aware of things that are going on around us though. I feel like each time a real connection between two real people is replaced with something artificial, our culture as a whole goes just a little bit more insane. I’m interested to see how this all pans out, mainly because I don’t have a whole lot of attachment to what our culture is now.

I’m posting what’s left of the suicide note on here in the form of images (all that was left of it).

The part that struck me the most:

The communist creed:
  From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
The capitalist creed:
  From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

I’m posting this because I agree with what was said. I believe that America is a wasteland of deceit where gains are privatized, and losses are socialized.

Like I’ve said and believe firmly, violence never solves anything… it continues cyclically and endlessly. It’s important, though, to see why violence happens and not just pass it off as “terrorism.” Yes, terrorism exists, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a reason behind it, no matter how misguided.

My heart and thoughts go out to those who lost their lives as a result of this incident. Yes, they were part of this unjust, corrupt system, but isn’t everyone? They were obvious targets but we’re all in this together, and it’s not fair they should pay when everyone involved (everyone) is just as guilty as the politicians and corporations.

UPDATE – found the original text, linked on what used to be Joe Stack’s website.

But no, these ain’t no robots. An group of engineers from UC Berkeley “restrained” a beetle, implanted electrodes into its brain, and used a remote to force the creature into controlled flight. I have to say this is a pretty disgusting act. As humans, we’ve now taken another life form, a being with its own free will and consciousness, and stripped it of just about all that makes it alive, and made it dance a jig for us. It still breathes and exists (for how long I wonder) but its very actions are now controlled by some group of people who did it just to see if they could. Congratulations on making the human race as a whole a just bit more repulsive than it was before.

Also, I don’t buy the “relax, it’s just a beetle” bullshit. Torture is torture, it doesn’t matter who it’s happening to. None of us can imagine what it’s like to have electrodes implanted in our brain administering continuous electrical shocks…and to justify a wrong by saying it happened to something small in size, or happened to something with an exoskeleton is no excuse. What makes it so separate from us? It’s a living, breathing, procreating biological machine that feels and responds to its world…just like us. The only real difference between a beetle and a human is that the human falsely thinks there is a difference between the two.

First article from Feb – insect control
Article on flight control – flight control

It is my firm belief that everyone who participated should be subject to remote control neural implants for a day, with a retarded 6 year old behind the controls.

I don’t support state-sanctioned gay marriage. Not in any way shape or form. I don’t think the state (political state, not geographic state) has the right to marry two men or two women. Neither does it have the right to marry a straight couple though. Marriage, although deeply ingrained in our society, is a religious ceremony. It’s a dance two people do to signify their unending commitment.

The state has absolutely no business supporting this ritual. I believe separation of church and state has been defiled by the state taking it upon itself to say who can marry and who cannot. Is that not up to the specific religion the couple in question are marrying under? What moral right does the state have to support a religious ritual and then only for a specific set of people?

I believe the state has overstepped its bounds. I believe the state, as it already does, should allow civil unions between partners, giving them the applicable tax breaks they would receive as a married couple, but not marry people. Marriage is a religious institution and as such should be completely unrecognized by the state.

Note that this would solve all conflicts surrounding marriage. Two gay men can get married at the devil-worshiping, blood-drinking, child-molesting church down the street, and Mr. Conservative who goes to the bread-eating, jesus-praising, child-molesting church up the street doesn’t have to recognize the two gay men’s marriage. It didn’t happen at his church or under his rules, so in his mind, the marriage can be null and void… but the state gives the two gay men their civil union, and then politely bows out of the conflict, letting the upstanding Christian and the society-destroying gays fight it out between themselves.

Everyone wins, and the state can wash its hands clean of all moral conflict surrounding a religous institution.